Back to Search Start Over

Agreement of Medication Information Derived From EHR Data Compared to Medicare Insurance Claims: An Analysis of Biologic Disease‐Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs.

Authors :
Li, Jing
Baker, Rahaf
Stovall, Rachael
Curtis, Jeffrey R.
Xie, Fenglong
Yazdany, Jinoos
Schmajuk, Gabriela
Source :
Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety; Oct2024, Vol. 33 Issue 10, p1-15, 15p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Few studies have reported the agreement between medication information derived from ambulatory EHR data compared to administrative claims for high‐cost specialty drugs. We used data from a national EHR‐enabled registry, the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE), with linked Medicare claims in a population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to investigate variations in agreement for different biologic disease‐modifying agents (bDMARDs) between two data sources (RISE EHR data vs. Medicare claims), categorized by drug, route of administration, and patient insurance factors (dual eligibility). Methods: Patients ≥ 65 years old, with ≥ 2 visits in RISE with RA ICD codes ≥ 30 days apart, and continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts B and D in 2017–2018 were included. We classified patients as bDMARD users or nonusers in Medicare claims or EHR data in 2018, and we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value (PPV), and negative predicted value (NPV) of EHR data for identifying bDMARD users, using Medicare as the reference standard. We also calculated these metrics after stratifying by clinic‐administered (Part B) versus. pharmacy‐dispensed (Part D) bDMARDs and by patient dual‐eligibility. Results: A total of 26 097 patients were included in the study. Using Medicare claims as the reference standard, EHR data had a sensitivity of 75.0%–90.8% for identifying patients with the same medication and route. PPV for Part B bDMARDs was higher compared with Part D bDMARDs (range 94.3%–97.3% vs. 51.0%–69.6%). We observed higher PPVs for Part D bDMARDs among patients who were dual‐eligible (range 82.4%–95.1%). Conclusion: The risk of misclassification of drug exposure based on EHR data sources alone is small for Medicare Part B bDMARDs but could be as high as 50% for Part D bDMARDs, in particular for patients who are not dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10538569
Volume :
33
Issue :
10
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180374588
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70020