Evaluation of stream ordering systems in the context of topography and open‐source data.

Satellite‐derived digital elevation models (DEMs) and geographic information systems (GIS) offer effective means for both qualitative and quantitative analysis of drainage networks within watersheds. An extensive review of various stream order systems reveals their outdated nature, given advancements in digital technology and the availability of fine to coarse resolutions data. Analysis of open‐source DEMs with resolutions ranging from 12.5 to 225 m, along with topographical maps at scales of 1:50 000 and 1:250 000, was conducted across four physiographically distinct micro‐watersheds of approximately equal size (~300 km2). The steepest descent algorithm (D8) was utilized to derive raster stream networks, applying a channel initiation threshold (CIT) of 900 m2 as a criterion. It was observed that stream order numbers are influenced by map scale, leading to variability in mainstream order extraction across different DEM datasets and topographic maps. To address this issue, an innovative stream order system was proposed to ensure consistent mainstream order regardless of the spatial resolution of DEM data or map scale. Correlation analysis highlighted the importance of considering both spatial resolution and topographic variability in stream order analysis, underscoring the significance of accurate DEM data and landscape characteristics in understanding stream network dynamics. This method of classifying stream orders is recognized by scientists in geography, geology, hydrology and geomorphology for providing crucial information about the size and strength of waterways within stream networks, contributing to effective water management strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]