Early Postoperative Outcomes of the Direct Superior Approach versus the Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background/Objectives: The direct superior approach (DSA) is a tissue-sparing alternative to the traditional posterior approach (PA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA), potentially offering improved recovery and fewer complications. This study compares perioperative parameters, radiological and functional outcomes, and complications between the DSA and the PA in primary THA. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus. Studies comparing the DSA and the PA in primary THA were included based on predefined criteria. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two authors. Statistical analyses included calculating standardized mean differences (SMD), odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the χ2 test, I2 statistics, and sensitivity analyses. Results: Out of 126 identified articles, 10 studies were included, which encompassed 28,063 patients (DSA: 1464; PA: 26,599). Significant advantages of the DSA over the PA were observed in blood loss (SMD −0.26, p < 0.01), transfusion rate (OR 0.59, p = 0.03), length of stay (SMD −0.59, p < 0.01), discharge to home rates (OR 2.32, p < 0.01), and incision length (SMD −2.75, p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in radiological outcomes or most functional scores, although the DSA showed higher Harris Hip Scores at 1 month (SMD 0.77, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The DSA offers significant perioperative advantages over the PA, including reduced blood loss, transfusion rates, LOS, incision length, and improved early functional recovery with higher discharge to home rates. Comparable complication rates and radiological outcomes support the DSA's safety and efficacy for quicker recovery in THA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]