Back to Search Start Over

Approaches and indications in laparoscopic choledoscopy.

Authors :
Slavu, Iulian
Tulin, Raluca
Dima, Ileana
Dogaru, Alexandru
Filipou, Florin
Socea, Bogdan
Oprescu-Macovei, Anca Monica
Tulin, Adrian
Source :
Journal of Mind & Medical Sciences; 2024, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p482-487, 6p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objectives. Up to 20% of patients with biliary lithiasis have bile duct stones, which are asymptomatic in 50% of cases. The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of choledoscopy in extracting stones from the main bile ducts. Materials and Methods. This is a retrospective study (January 2014 - December 2024) on 2309 patients who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic choledoscopy was performed in 32 cases. Of the 32 patients with complete clearance, none had residual common bile duct stones (CBDS) at 1 year postoperatively. Results. The ideal approach in our study was the transcystic approach, with the shortest hospital stays (mean 3 days) transcholedochal approach; it was only feasible in 7 patients. All patients had transcystic drainage that was removed after 10 days (mean operative time 105 min). The transcholedochal approach was demanding from a technical point of view. Primary ductal closure was performed in 5 patients. Ductal closure with transcystic drain was in 9 patients. A total of 14 patients had a T-tube and a longer operative time (on average 170 min). Conversion to open surgery was performed in 4 cases, due to difficult dissection at the level of the hepatic porta. Conclusions. LCBDE for previously documented or discovered CBDS during LC is a safe and feasible procedure. The technique is technically demanding, and requires advanced laparoscopic skills. Patient selection is very important, but the transcystic approach for LCBDE when possible is optimal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26014920
Volume :
11
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Mind & Medical Sciences
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180841121
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.22543/2392-7674.1563