Access to Sudden Hearing Loss Care at Urgent Care Centers.

Objectives: To compare patient access to urgent care centers (UCCs) with a diagnosis of sudden hearing loss based on insurance. Methods: One hundred twenty‐five random UCCs in states with Medicaid expansion and 125 random UCCs in states without Medicaid expansion were contacted by a research assistant posing as a family member seeking care on behalf of a patient with a one‐week history of sudden, unilateral hearing loss. Each clinic was called once as a Medicaid patient and once as a private insurance (PI) patient for 500 total calls. Each phone encounter was evaluated for insurance acceptance and self‐pay price. Secondary outcomes included other measures of timely/accessible care. Chi‐square/McNemar's tests and independent/paired sample t‐tests were performed to determine whether there were statistically significant differences between expansion status and insurance type. Calls ended before answering questions were not included in the analysis. Results: Medicaid acceptance rate was significantly lower than PI (68.1% vs. 98.4%, p < 0.001). UCCs in Medicaid expansion states were significantly more likely to accept Medicaid (76.8% vs. 59.2%, p = 0.003). The mean wage‐adjusted self‐pay price was significantly greater in states with Medicaid expansion at $169.84 than in states without at $145.34 when called as a Medicaid patient (mean difference: $24.50, 95% Confidence Interval: $0.45–$48.54, p = 0.046). The rates of referral to an emergency department and self‐pay price nondisclosure rates were greater for Medicaid calls than for private insurance calls (8.2% vs. 0.4% and 17.4% vs. 5.8%; p < 0.001 for both). Conclusion: Medicaid patients with otologic emergencies face reduced access to care at UCCs. Level of Evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 134:5066–5072, 2024 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]