Back to Search Start Over

Treatment of Established Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy with N-Palmitoylethanolamide: A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II Pilot Study.

Authors :
Davis, Mellar P.
Ulrich, Angela
Segal, Rebecca
Gudena, Vinay
Ruddy, Kathryn J.
D'Andre, Stacy
Giridhar, Karthik V.
Vasireddy, Vamsi K.
Agarwal, Rajiv
Azzouqa, Abdel-Ghani
Novotny, Paul
McCue, Shaylene
Bauer, Brent
Loprinzi, Charles L.
Source :
Cancers; Dec2024, Vol. 16 Issue 24, p4244, 10p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Simple Summary: Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy is a major clinical problem, with limited treatments available to try to reverse it. Some preliminary data suggested that palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) may effectively treat this condition. Pursuant to this, a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase 2 clinical trial was developed to look for evidence to support a future, more definitive phase 3 clinical trial. Eighty-nine patients participated in this clinical trial. Unfortunately, the data from the present phase 2 trial did not support the idea that PEA was useful in this situation. Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) from oxaliplatin and taxane drugs is a bothersome toxicity. Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) has been reported to improve myelinated nerve fiber function in patients experiencing painful CIPN. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of PEA in patients with established CIPN. Methods: Eligible patients were adults who had pain, numbness, tingling, or other symptoms of CIPN for at least three months following completion of paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, or cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Study patients were randomized to one of the two treatment groups (PEA versus placebo, both administered either once or twice daily). The CIPN20 questionnaire was assessed weekly. Results: A total of 17 males and 71 females participated in the study; most had neuropathy from paclitaxel. Most (85%) finished 8 weeks of treatment. There was no suggestion that either of the PEA arms did any better than the combined placebo arms. There was no signal of significant toxicity differences between the three study arms. Quality of life outcome measures were similar between the study arms, as were cognitive function evaluations. Discussion: PEA failed to improve established CIPN. Future trials might explore whether PEA may be effective in preventing CIPN or cognitive changes based on data that suggest it may be helpful in this situation. Conclusions: PEA failed to improve established chemotherapy-induced neuropathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20726694
Volume :
16
Issue :
24
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Cancers
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
181915622
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16244244