Experimental comparison of aerosol transmission in displacement ventilation and mixing ventilation in a meeting scenario.

The performance of displacement ventilation (DV) and mixing ventilation (MV) in aerosol contamination control was compared. The considered contamination was an aerosol emitted from a person in meeting scenarios of two and four persons. The experiments were carried out in a full-scale room measuring 4.4 m × 5.2 m × 2.9 m. Particle counting was carried out at 41 measurement points in the room to assess the concentration field of particles in the room and in the inhalation zone. The influence of the supply airflow rate and the number of activated thermal mannequins on the contaminant removal effectiveness were examined. The main conclusion is that the DV system was superior to the MV system in reducing contamination. An enhanced contaminant removal effectiveness of displacement ventilation was observed for all supply air flow rates and increased with higher airflow rates. At lower airflow rates, contamination in the inhalation zone was reduced by 40% compared to mixing ventilation, while at higher flow rates, the reduction surpassed 50%. This study highlights the advantages of displacement ventilation in terms of contamination control, infection prevention and energy efficiency, emphasising the importance of ventilation system selection for indoor environments, particularly those where airborne transmission risks are prevalent. Highlights: Displacement ventilation outperformed mixing ventilation in aerosol control in a meeting scenario. The contaminant removal effectiveness was superior in the inhalation zone and above exposed mannequins compared to the reference points at the breathing level. A possible flow rate reduction with displacement ventilation can significantly reduce energy costs. Ventilation system choice is crucial for infection control and energy saving. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]