Back to Search Start Over

Zinc (Zn) absorption: Comparison of extrinsic label with intrinsic Zn in test meals.

Authors :
Xiao-Yang Sheng
Hambidge, K. Michael
Krebs, Nancy F.
Miller, Leland V.
Westcott, Jamie E.
Sian Lei
Source :
FASEB Journal; Apr2007, Vol. 21 Issue 5, pA171-A171, 1/5p
Publication Year :
2007

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extrinsic labeling techniques for determining fractional absorption of Zn (FAZ) have never been adequately evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study, part of a larger project, was to compare results for determination of FAZ<subscript>extrinsic</subscript> from a variety of different total diets using our own extrinsic labeling technique with results for simultaneous determination of FAZ<subscript>intrinsic</subscript>. DESIGN: FAZ was determined for 5 days in 23 adults (Female) while consuming a constant rotating diet based on habitual intake. Zn intake ranged from 5-33mg/d, median 7.6mg/d. For extrinsic labeling, <superscript>70</superscript>Zn tracer was administered gradually during the second half of each meal and absorption determined by our dual isotope tracer ratio (DITR) technique (<superscript>67</superscript>Zn infused IV) and by fecal monitoring (FM). FmZ<subscript>intrinsic</subscript> was calculated from the sum of net absorption of Zn and intestinal excretion of endogenous Zn. RESULTS: Mean ± SD FAZ by DITR, FM and intrinsic were 0.28±0.11, 0.30±0.11 and 0.31±0.15, respectively (ANOVA, p=0.229). CONCLUSION: Small, not statistically significant, differences were found between these 3 methods for determining FAZ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08926638
Volume :
21
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
FASEB Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25632328
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.21.5.a171-a