Back to Search Start Over

Validation of MIPAS-ENVISAT NO2 operational data.

Authors :
Wetzel, G.
Bracher, A.
Funke, B.
Goutail, F.
Hendrick, F.
Lambert, J.-C.
Mikuteit, S.
Piccolo, C.
Pirre, M.
Bazureau, A.
Belotti, C.
Blumenstock, T.
De Mazière, M.
Fischer, H.
Huret, N.
Ionov, D.
López-Puertas, M.
Maucher, G.
Oelhaf, H.
Pommereau, J.-P.
Source :
Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics; 2007, Vol. 7 Issue 12, p3261-3284, 24p, 7 Charts, 19 Graphs
Publication Year :
2007

Abstract

The Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) instrument was launched aboard the environmental satellite ENVISAT into its sun-synchronous orbit on 1 March 2002. The short-lived species NO<subscript>2</subscript> is one of the key target products of MIPAS that are operationally retrieved from limb emission spectra measured in the stratosphere and mesosphere. Within the MIPAS validation activities, a large number of independent observations from balloons, satellites and ground-based stations have been compared to European Space Agency (ESA) version 4.61 operational NO<subscript>2</subscript>data comprising the time period from July 2002 until March 2004 where MIPAS measured with full spectral resolution. Comparisons between MIPAS and balloon-borne observations carried out in 2002 and 2003 in the Arctic, at mid-latitudes, and in the tropics show a very good agreement below 40 km altitude with a mean deviation of roughly 3%, virtually without any significant bias. The comparison to ACE satellite observations exhibits only a small negative bias of MIPAS which appears not to be significant. The independent satellite instruments HALOE, SAGE II, and POAM III confirm in common for the spring-summer time period a negative bias of MIPAS in the Arctic and a positive bias in the Antarctic middle and upper stratosphere exceeding frequently the combined systematic error limits. In contrast to the ESA operational processor, the IMK/IAA retrieval code allows accurate inference of NO<subscript>2</subscript> volume mixing ratios under consideration of all important non-LTE processes. Large differences between both retrieval results appear especially at higher altitudes, above about 50 to 55 km. These differences might be explained at least partly by non- LTE under polar winter conditions but not at mid-latitudes. Below this altitude region mean differences between both processors remain within 5% (during night) and up to 10% (during day) under undisturbed (September 2002) conditions and up to 40% under perturbed polar night conditions (February and March 2004). The intercomparison of ground-based NDACC observations shows no significant bias between the FTIR measurements in Kiruna (68° N) and MIPAS in summer 2003 but larger deviations in autumn and winter. The mean deviation over the whole comparison period remains within 10%. A mean negative bias of 15% for MIPAS daytime and 8% for nighttime observations has been determined for UV-vis comparisons over Harestua (60° N). Results of a pole-to-pole comparison of ground-based DOAS/UV-visible sunrise and MIPAS mid-morning column data has shown that the mean agreement in 2003 falls within the accuracy limit of the comparison method. Altogether, it can be indicated that MIPAS NO<subscript>2</subscript> profiles yield valuable information on the vertical distribution of NO<subscript>2</subscript> in the lower and middle stratosphere (below about 45 km) during day and night with an overall accuracy of about 10-20% and a precision of typically 5-15% such that the data are useful for scientific studies. In cases where extremely high NO<subscript>2</subscript> occurs in the mesosphere (polar winter) retrieval results in the lower and middle stratosphere are less accurate than under undisturbed atmospheric conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16807316
Volume :
7
Issue :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26227091
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3261-2007