Back to Search Start Over

On the Asymmetry between Cyclonic and Anticyclonic Flow in Basins with Sloping Boundaries.

Authors :
Nøst, Ole Anders
Nilsson, Johan
Nycander, Jonas
Source :
Journal of Physical Oceanography; Apr2008, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p771-787, 17p, 2 Color Photographs, 1 Black and White Photograph, 1 Chart, 5 Graphs
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

The authors present results from laboratory experiments and numerical simulations of the barotropic circulation in a basin with sloping boundaries forced by a surface stress. Focus is placed on flows with large-scale Rossby numbers that are significantly smaller than unity. The results of the laboratory experiments and simulations show that cyclonic circulation follows the isobaths, the flow pattern being independent of the strength of the forcing. For anticyclonic circulation, the flow pattern changes with forcing strength. It is similar to the cyclonic topographically steered pattern for weak forcing, and it develops strong cross-slope flows for strong forcing. Linear dynamics are symmetric between cyclonic and anticyclonic circulations and give a good description of the cyclonic and weakly forced anticyclonic circulations. The analysis of the nonlinear dynamics shows that topographically steered cyclonic flows are all stable and steady energy-minimum solutions to the inviscid nonlinear equations. This implies that the nonlinear terms (advection of relative vorticity) are always small for the topographically steered cyclonic flow. For anticyclonic flow, the situation is very different. It is possible that no anticyclonic topographically steered flow is ever a solution to the steady inviscid equations. And if such a steady anticyclonic flow does exist, it is likely to be unstable, since it must correspond to a saddle point in energy rather than to a minimum or a maximum. The nonlinear terms are important when the Rossby number is larger than the Ekman number, which is the case for the anticyclonic experiments with strongest forcing. For these experiments, the advection of relative vorticity prevents the flow from following topography, creating locations with strong relative vorticity and cross-slope flow. The development of cross-slope flow can be understood from the conservation of potential vorticity in basins with irregular topography. The separation of anticyclonic flow from steep topography shown in the laboratory experiments and the theoretical analysis herein are in agreement with features like the Gulf Stream separation from the continental slope at Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00223670
Volume :
38
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Physical Oceanography
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31632689
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JPO3714.1