Successful use of “cryo-mapping” to avoid phrenic nerve damage during ostial superior vena caval ablation despite nerve proximity.

Abstract Background  The SVC may require ablation to treat atrial fibrillation. Phrenic nerve proximity identified with pacing maneuvers may preclude ablation. Methods  We tested a new method using “cryo-mapping” to ablate despite nerve proximity. Results  Of 833 patients undergoing ablation, 110 (12%) had arrhythmogenic substrate at the SVC/RA junction. Of these 110 patients, 66 (60%) had consistent diaphragmatic stimulation when pacing at 10 mA at the prospective site of ablation. Of these 66 patients, 7 had continued arrhythmogenicity despite attempts to modify this substrate. For these 7 patients, we paced 4 cm into the SVC where consistent phrenic nerve stimulation was obtained, and cryoablation at −30°C was performed at sites requiring ablation. In 6 of 7 patients (86%), with continued diaphragmatic capture, cryoablation at −70/−80°C was then performed. In 1 of 7 patients (14%), diaphragmatic stimulation ceased at −30°C, and energy delivery stopped. In the 6 patients in whom cryoablation was completed, the arrhythmogenic substrate was successfully ablated without phrenic nerve injury. Conclusions  A novel “cryo-mapping” technique during phrenic nerve pacing can be used to successfully ablate arrhythmogenic substrate at the SVC/RA junction despite phrenic nerve proximity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]