Back to Search
Start Over
What's in a Name?
- Source :
- Philosophical Investigations; Oct2008, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p340-358, 19p
- Publication Year :
- 2008
-
Abstract
- This paper is about the mode of being of names. The paper begins by explaining why the joke is on commentators who see Lewis Carroll's White Knight as applying the use/mention distinction. Then it argues that the real problem with the distinction is that the idea that names are used to mention what they name depends on mistakenly conceiving of language as existing autonomously; and that philosophers have this conception because they fail to appreciate what they are doing when they philosophise about language. This failure also explains why philosophers mistakenly think of any manifestation of a name as a (physical) token. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- NAMES
ONTOLOGY
LANGUAGE & languages
PHILOSOPHERS
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 01900536
- Volume :
- 31
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Philosophical Investigations
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 34137844
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9205.2008.00354.x