Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic accuracy of a bedside D-dimer assay and alveolar dead-space measurement for rapid exclusion of pulmonary embolism: a multicenter study.

Authors :
Kline, Jeffrey A.
Israel, Elizabeth G.
Michelson, Edward A.
O'Neil, Brian J.
Plewa, Michael C.
Portelli, David C.
Kline, J A
Israel, E G
Michelson, E A
O'Neil, B J
Plewa, M C
Portelli, D C
Source :
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association; 2/14/2001, Vol. 285 Issue 6, p761-768, 8p, 3 Charts
Publication Year :
2001

Abstract

<bold>Context: </bold>A previous study suggested that the combination of a normal D-dimer assay and normal alveolar dead-space fraction is a highly sensitive screening test for pulmonary embolism (PE).<bold>Objective: </bold>To determine if the combination of a normal alveolar dead-space fraction (volume of alveolar dead space/tidal volume </=20%) and a normal whole-blood agglutination D-dimer assay can exclude PE in emergency department (ED) patients.<bold>Design: </bold>Prospective, noninterventional study conducted in 1998-1999. Study data were obtained prior to standard testing for PE, consisting of radionuclide lung scanning or contrast-enhanced computed tomography and 6-month follow-up plus selective use of venous ultrasonography and pulmonary angiography. Imaging studies were interpreted by blinded observers.<bold>Setting: </bold>Six urban teaching hospitals in the United States.<bold>Patients: </bold>A total of 380 hemodynamically stable ED patients aged 18 years or older with suspected acute PE.<bold>Main Outcome Measures: </bold>Sensitivity and specificity for PE with a positive test defined as having either alveolar dead-space fraction or D-dimer assay results abnormal. Alveolar dead-space fraction was determined by subtracting airway dead space from physiological dead space (determined using the modified Bohr equation) and D-dimer assay, assayed at bedside using 20 microL of arterial blood.<bold>Results: </bold>Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in 64 patients (16.8%), of those 20 had an abnormal D-dimer assay result, 3 had an abnormal alveolar dead-space fraction, 40 had abnormal results in both, and 1 had normal results for both tests. The sensitivity for diagnosis of PE was 98.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.6%-100.0%). Among the 316 patients without PE, both D-dimer and dead-space results were normal in 163, for a specificity of 51.6% (95% CI, 46.1%-57.1%). Posterior probability of PE with normal results on both tests was 0.75% (95% CI, 0%-3.4%).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>In this multicenter study of ED patients, a normal D-dimer assay result plus a normal alveolar dead-space fraction was associated with a low prevalence of PE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00987484
Volume :
285
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
4086387
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.6.761