Using a decision grid process to evaluate library collections and e-journals.

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present how the results of research on electronic resources use and selection policies in research libraries can be used. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents the sources for the establishment of the decision grid. The entire process and criteria for collection evaluation are presented from the funding perspective. The quantitative decision grid evaluation process used by the national body funding research, the Slovenian Research Agency, is presented and its use demonstrated. Findings - For the fourth year in a row, the new decision grid was used to evaluate proposals for financing the library collections of almost one hundred research libraries in Slovenia. Each year, lists of quantitative evaluation elements are prepared and these are the basis for funding decisions. The results so far have been positive. The new criteria have encouraged involvement and participation in consortia, selection and deselection on the basis of the quality of journals, and movement to electronic journal collections. Practical implications - The new research library environment that has evolved as technology has developed not Only requires new models of functioning and providing service but also new financial resources. It is important to use library and information science research results and findings in the decision-making process of the various involved parties regarding budget and financial inputs. Originality/value - The paper offers new data on the old dilemma of how to best determine the value of a journal in the context of a library collection relative to the type of library and the needs of its users. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]