Back to Search Start Over

Differences in aromatic-DNA adduct levels between alveolar macrophages and subpopulation of white blood cells from smokers.

Authors :
Godschalk, RWL
Maas, LM
Van Zandwijk, N
van 't Veer, LJ
Breedijk, A
Borm, PJA
Verhaert, J
Kleinjans, JCS
van Schooten, FJ
Source :
Carcinogenesis; May1998, Vol. 19 Issue 5, p819-825, 7p
Publication Year :
1998

Abstract

The 32P-post-labelling assay for DNA adduct quantification gives the opportunity to examine endogenous exposure to DNA reactive compounds. Most human biomonitoring studies applied white blood cells (WBC) or cells obtained by broncho-alveolar lavages (BAL) as source of DNA, but still it is not clear what cell type represents the most reliable indicator for exposure to cigarette smoke-associated genotoxins. At first, we examined DNA adduct levels by means of nuclease P1 (NP1) enriched 32P-post-labelling in separated WBC subpopulations after in vitro incubations for 18 h with 10 μM benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P). DNA adduct levels were highest in monocytes (10.7±2.9 adducts/108 nucleotides, n=8), followed by lymphocytes (5.9±1.7, n=8), and granulocytes (0.5±0.2, n=8). Secondly, aromatic-DNA adduct levels were determined in BAL cells and WBC-subsets from (non-)smoking volunteers. In smoking individuals, adduct levels were in the ranking order: BAL cells (3.7±1.0, n=5) > monocytes (2.0±0.5, n=8)  lymphocytes (1.6±0.4, n=8) >granulocytes (0.8±0.2, n=8) by NP1-enrichment and monocytes (9.0±3.2, n=5)  lymphocytes (8.0±2.1, n=6) > granulocytes (2.1±0.3, n=7) by butanol-enriched 32P-post-labelling. Aromatic-DNA adduct levels were significantly higher in WBC-subsets of smokers as compared with non-smokers except for DNA adducts in granulocytes using butanol enrichment. Thirdly, dose-response relationships were investigated in mononuclear white blood cells (MNC, i.e. monocytes plus lymphocytes) and BAL-cells of a larger group of smoking individuals (n=78). Adduct levels in MNC were related to daily exposure to cigarette tar (r=0.31, P<0.01). Adduct levels in BAL cells seemed to be correlated with pack-years, but after correction for age this relationship was lost. Butanol extraction resulted in 5-6 fold higher DNA adduct levels in MNC, whereas butanol extraction of BAL-DNA of the same individuals yielded only 2-fold higher adduct levels. The two enrichment procedures of 32P-post-labelling were correlated in BAL cells (r=0.86, P<0.001, n=12). We conclude that particularly MNC are good surrogates for the detection of smoking-related DNA adducts. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01433334
Volume :
19
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Carcinogenesis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
44442566
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/19.5.819