How should patients consult? A study of the differences in viewpoint between doctors and patients.

<bold>Background: </bold>Increasing pressure on limited NHS resources has led to the introduction in primary care of a skill mix which seeks to match clinical presentation to an intervention based on skills and training. There has also been increasing emphasis on the use of telephone consultations. However, outcomes on the benefits of these different approaches may be difficult to obtain and process variables such as the views of patients may be important.<bold>Objective: </bold>The objective of the study was to answer the following questions (i) how many existing GP consultations do doctors and patients assess as being suitable for consultation with a specially trained nurse or for telephone advice from a doctor?; (ii) do doctors and patients share similar views on the suitability of individual cases?; and (iii) do these assessments differ between acute, chronic and urgent cases?<bold>Method: </bold>A sample of 750 patients comprising of 150 patients attending for booked consultation with each of five doctors were interviewed prior to the consultation and asked whether they would be happy to see a specially trained practice nurse or if their problem could be dealt with by a doctor on the telephone. For each case the GP gave his response. A similar study was undertaken with 150 'extras' patients who needed to be seen urgently and who could not wait for an appointment the following day. The viewpoint of the GP was compared with that of the patient.<bold>Results: </bold>GPs felt that 20% of all booked cases could be seen by a nurse compared with the patients' assessment of 29%. These figures were higher for acute booked cases (30 and 34%) and for urgent extras (44 and 58%). There was a poor agreement between the viewpoints of doctor and patient especially for chronic booked cases although this agreement increased with the more acute presentations. The number of cases that could be dealt with on the telephone ranged from 5 to 9% with poor agreement between doctor and patient.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>This study extends the findings of a number of others which indicate that patients can be seen satisfactorily by nurses, and that both doctors and patients see scope for increasing the number of consultations dealt with by nurses. Booked patients with chronic presentations and urgent extras are more likely than their doctors to think that they could be dealt with by the nurse. This may be due to a difference in perspective between doctors and patients about the outcome they hope to achieve in the consultation. Further qualitative work is needed to explore these differences and to clarify the best approach to this expanding area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]