Comparison of physicians' and cancer prone women's attitudes about breast/ovarian prophylactic surgery. Results from two national surveys.

Prophylactic surgery is a major issue for breast/ovarian cancer prone women. Bio-clinical data to help in the decision-making are not sufficient. In this context of uncertainty, physicians' and women's attitudes to prophylactic surgery is information of great value. The physicians' attitudes were assessed by a randomised national sample of practitioners involved in breast and ovarian cancer management. The patients' attitudes were appraised with a pre-consultation self-administered questionnaire presented during a one-year period to all women in five cancer genetic clinics chosen, for their representative geographical locations and their activity level. Consent to prophylactic surgery is higher among physicians than among patients ( p < 0.0001). Acceptability of mastectomy is lower than that of oophorectomy in both patients and physicians ( p < 0.0001 in both groups). In addition, age at which the intervention is proposed to be performed is a key determinant for both mastectomy and oophorectomy acceptability, in both physicians and patients ( p < 0.001 for each comparison). Particularly, the age of 40 years seems to be a critical threshold for the acceptability of prophylactic oophorectomy. In contrast, respondents' age at the time of the survey has no significant effect on the acceptability rate. The higher acceptability rate of prophylactic oophorectomy compared to that of mastectomy observed in the physicians' survey is paradoxical because a more substantial medical impact on life expectancy was expected from the latter. Our results indicate that assumed reduced mortality is not the main criterion steering acceptability. It was anticipated that prophylactic mastectomy should be rarely performed in France. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]