Back to Search Start Over

Kinematic analysis of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knee prostheses by simulation.

Authors :
Higashijima, K.
Ishida, A.
Fukuoka, Y.
Hoshino, A.
Minamitani, H.
Source :
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing; Jan2002, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p22-28, 7p
Publication Year :
2002

Abstract

The object of the study was to model fixed-bearing knee prostheses (FBKs) and mobile-bearing knee prostheses (MBKs) during weight-bearing deep knee bends and to analyse and compare the kinematics of the two prosthesis types. To obtain quantitative data, an overall model of a leg was constructed, and this included a three-dimensional model of the tibiofemoral joint and simplified two-dimensional models of the ankle and patellofemoral joint. The simulated movement pattern of the tibiofemoral contact point in the FBK was analysed to show the posterior contact position on the tibia at full extension and anterior translation as the knee was flexed from 30 degrees to 90 degrees. The simulated maximum displacements of the medial and lateral contact positions of the FBK were 5.6 and 6.2 mm, respectively. These results were almost in agreement with experimental studies. Compared with the FBK, the movement pattern of the tibiofemoral contact point in the MBK for the anterior contact position on the tibia at full extension and posterior translation, with respect to the tibia as the knee was flexed, gave results closer to those of the normal knee. The simulated displacements of the medial and lateral contact positions of the MBK with respect to the tibia were 9.0 and 13.0 mm from full extension to 90 degrees flexion, respectively. The difference in the kinematic results between the FBK and the MBK could be accounted for by movement of the insert and the larger force of the posterior cruciate ligament on the MBK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01400118
Volume :
40
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
50077205
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347691