Back to Search Start Over

The prognostic significance of soluble NKG2D ligands in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors :
Nückel, H.
Switala, M.
Sellmann, L.
Horn, P. A.
Dürig, J.
Dührsen, U.
Küppers, R.
Grosse-Wilde, H.
Rebmann, V.
Source :
Leukemia (08876924); Jun2010, Vol. 24 Issue 6, p1152-1159, 8p, 2 Diagrams, 2 Charts, 3 Graphs
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Soluble or membrane-anchored ligands of NKG2D and their receptor have a critical role in the elimination of tumor cells and disease progression. Plasma samples of 98 patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were analyzed with specific ELISA systems for soluble major histocompatibility complex class I-related chains (sMICA and sMICB) and UL-16-binding proteins (ULBP1, 2, and 3). The flow cytometric analysis of MICA on CLL cells and natural killer group 2 member D (NKG2D) receptors on NK cells was performed after thawing of frozen peripheral blood lymphocytes of CLL patients (N=51). Levels of sMICA, sMICB, and sULBP2 were significantly increased (P<0.001) compared with 48 controls, whereas sULBP1 3 were not detectable in patients and controls. Levels of sMICA>990 pg/ml (P=0.014), sMICB>200 pg/ml (P=0.0001), and sULBP2>105 pg/ml (P<0.0001) were associated with poor treatment-free survival (TFS). Neither MICA nor NKG2D expression could be related to clinical parameters. In multivariate analysis Binet stage (P=0.002), sULBP2 (P=0.002) and ZAP-70 (P=0.002) were independent predictive factors for TFS. In patients with Binet stage A, sULBP2 levels>105 pg/ml were strongly associated (P=0.0025) with poor TFS. Our data show that soluble but not membrane-anchored NKG2D ligands or receptors are of prognostic significance in CLL. Moreover, sULBP2 seems to be useful to identify early-stage patients with risk of disease progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08876924
Volume :
24
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Leukemia (08876924)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
51313396
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2010.74