Cite
Comparison of SNR efficiencies and strain for cine DENSE using conventional EPI, flyback EPI and spiral k-space trajectories.
MLA
Xiaodong Zhong, et al. “Comparison of SNR Efficiencies and Strain for Cine DENSE Using Conventional EPI, Flyback EPI and Spiral k-Space Trajectories.” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Elsevier B.V. ), vol. 13, no. Suppl 1, Jan. 2011, pp. 1–2. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-S1-P58.
APA
Xiaodong Zhong, Spottiswoode, B. S., Meyer, C. H., & Epstein, F. H. (2011). Comparison of SNR efficiencies and strain for cine DENSE using conventional EPI, flyback EPI and spiral k-space trajectories. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Elsevier B.V. ), 13(Suppl 1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-S1-P58
Chicago
Xiaodong Zhong, Bruce S. Spottiswoode, Craig H. Meyer, and Frederick H. Epstein. 2011. “Comparison of SNR Efficiencies and Strain for Cine DENSE Using Conventional EPI, Flyback EPI and Spiral k-Space Trajectories.” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Elsevier B.V. ) 13 (Suppl 1): 1–2. doi:10.1186/1532-429X-13-S1-P58.