Back to Search Start Over

Hypoglycaemia risk with insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in type 2 and type 1 diabetes: a pre-planned meta-analysis of phase 3 trials.

Authors :
Ratner, R. E.
Gough, S. C. L.
Mathieu, C.
Del Prato, S.
Bode, B.
Mersebach, H.
Endahl, L.
Zinman, B.
Source :
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism; Feb2013, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p175-184, 10p, 1 Diagram, 7 Charts
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Aim Hypoglycaemia and the fear of hypoglycaemia are barriers to achieving normoglycaemia with insulin. Insulin degludec ( IDeg) has an ultra-long and stable glucose-lowering effect, with low day-to-day variability. This pre-planned meta-analysis aimed to demonstrate the superiority of IDeg over insulin glargine ( IGlar) in terms of fewer hypoglycaemic episodes at equivalent HbA1c in type 2 and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T2DM/T1DM). Methods Pooled patient-level data for self-reported hypoglycaemia from all seven (five in T2DM and two in T1DM) randomized, controlled, phase 3a, treat-to-target trials in the IDeg clinical development programme comparing IDeg once-daily ( OD) vs. IGlar OD were analysed. Results Four thousand three hundred and thirty subjects (2899 IDeg OD vs. 1431 IGlar OD) were analysed. Among insulin-naïve T2DM subjects, significantly lower rates of overall confirmed, nocturnal confirmed and severe hypoglycaemic episodes were reported with IDeg vs. IGlar: estimated rate ratio ( RR):0.83[0.70;0.98]<subscript>95%</subscript> <subscript>CI</subscript>, RR:0.64[0.48;0.86]<subscript>95%</subscript> <subscript>CI</subscript> and RR:0.14[0.03;0.70]<subscript>95%</subscript> <subscript>CI</subscript>. In the overall T2DM population, significantly lower rates of overall confirmed and nocturnal confirmed episodes were reported with IDeg vs. IGlar [ RR:0.83[0.74;0.94]<subscript>95%</subscript> <subscript>CI</subscript> and RR:0.68[0.57;0.82]<subscript>95%</subscript> <subscript>CI</subscript>). In the T1DM population, the rate of nocturnal confirmed episodes was significantly lower with IDeg vs. IGlar during maintenance treatment ( RR:0.75[0.60;0.94]<subscript>95%</subscript> <subscript>CI</subscript>). Reduction in hypoglycaemia with IDeg vs. IGlar was more pronounced during maintenance treatment in all populations. Conclusions The limitations of this study include the open-label design and exclusion of subjects with recurrent severe hypoglycaemia. This meta-analysis confirms that similar improvements in HbA1c can be achieved with fewer hypoglycaemic episodes, particularly nocturnal episodes, with IDeg vs. IGlar across a broad spectrum of patients with diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14628902
Volume :
15
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
84578140
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12032