Back to Search Start Over

Effects of the neurological wake-up test on clinical examination, intracranial pressure, brain metabolism and brain tissue oxygenation in severely brain-injured patients.

Authors :
Helbok, Raimund
Kurtz, Pedro
Schmidt, Michael J.
Stuart, Morgan R.
Fernandez, Luis
Connolly, Sander E.
Lee, Kiwon
Schmutzhard, Erich
A Mayer, Stephan
Claassen, Jan
Badjatia, Neeraj
Source :
Critical Care; 2012, Vol. 16 Issue 6, pR226-R233, 8p, 1 Chart, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Introduction: Daily interruption of sedation (IS) has been implemented in 30 to 40% of intensive care units worldwide and may improve outcome in medical intensive care patients. Little is known about the benefit of IS in acutely brain-injured patients. Methods: This prospective observational study was performed in a neuroscience intensive care unit in a tertiary-care academic center. Twenty consecutive severely brain-injured patients with multimodal neuromonitoring were analyzed for levels of brain lactate, pyruvate and glucose, intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and brain tissue oxygen tension (P<subscript>bt</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript>) during IS trials. Results: Of the 82 trial days, 54 IS-trials were performed as interruption of sedation and analgesics were not considered safe on 28 days (34%). An increase in the FOUR Score (Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score) was observed in 50% of IS-trials by a median of three (two to four) points. Detection of a new neurologic deficit occurred in one trial (2%), and in one-third of IS-trials the trial had to be stopped due to an ICP-crisis (> 20 mmHg), agitation or systemic desaturation. In IS-trials that had to be aborted, a significant increase in ICP and decrease in P<subscript>bt</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript> (P < 0.05), including 67% with critical values of P<subscript>bt</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript> < 20 mmHg, a tendency to brain metabolic distress (P < 0.07) was observed. Conclusions: Interruption of sedation revealed new relevant clinical information in only one trial and a large number of trials could not be performed or had to be stopped due to safety issues. Weighing pros and cons of IS-trials in patients with acute brain injury seems important as related side effects may overcome the clinical benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13648535
Volume :
16
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Critical Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
86363084
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11880