Back to Search Start Over

Who would use PrEP? Factors associated with intention to use among MSM in London: a community survey.

Authors :
Aghaizu, Adamma
Mercey, Danielle
Copas, Andrew
Johnson, Anne M.
Hart, Graham
Nardone, Anthony
Source :
Sexually Transmitted Infections; May2013, Vol. 89 Issue 3, p207-211, 5p, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Objective To assess current and intended future use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among men who have sex with men (MSM) and characterise those attending sexual health clinics, the anticipated PrEP delivery setting. Design Cross-sectional study. Methods Self-administered survey of 842 HIV negative MSM recruited from social venues in London in 2011. Results One in 10 (10.2%, 83/814, 95% CI 8.2% to 12.5%) and one in 50 (2.1%, 17/809, 95% CI 1.2% to 3.3%) reported having ever used post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and PrEP respectively. Half reported they would be likely to use PrEP if it became available as a daily pill (50.3%, 386/786, 95% CI 46.7% to 53.9%). MSM were more likely to consider future PrEP use if they were <35 years (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.57, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.14), had unprotected anal intercourse with casual partners (AOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.56), and had previously used PEP (AOR 1.94, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.24). Over half of MSM (54.8% 457/834 95% CI 51.3 to 58.2) attended a sexual health clinic the previous year. Independent factors associated with attendance were age <35 (AOR 2.29, 95% CI 1.68 to 3.13), and ≥10 anal sex partners in the last year (AOR 2.49, 95% CI 1.77 to 3.52). Conclusions The concept of PrEP for HIV prevention in the form of a daily pill is acceptable to half of sexually active MSM in London. MSM reporting higher risk behaviours attend sexual health clinics suggesting this is a suitable setting for PrEP delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13684973
Volume :
89
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
87004129
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2012-050648