Back to Search
Start Over
Agnotology: learning from mistakes.
- Source :
- Earth System Dynamics Discussions; 2013, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p451-505, 55p, 2 Charts, 4 Graphs
- Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Replication is an important part of science, and by repeating past analyses, we show that a number of papers in the scientific literature contain severe methodological flaws which can easily be identified through simple tests and demonstrations. In many cases, shortcomings are related to a lack of robustness, leading to results that are not universally valid but rather an artifact of a particular experimental set-up. Some examples presented here have ignored data that do not fit the conclusions, and in several other cases, inappropriate statistical methods have been adopted or conclusions have been based on misconceived physics. These papers may serve as educational case studies for why certain analytical approaches sometimes are unsuitable in providing reliable answers. They also highlight the merit of replication. A lack of common replication has repercussions for the quality of the scientific literature, and may be a reason why some controversial questions remain unanswered even when ignorance could be reduced. Agnotology is the study of such ignorance. A free and open-source software is provided for demonstration purposes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 21904995
- Volume :
- 4
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Earth System Dynamics Discussions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 89920433
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.5194/esdd-4-451-2013