STILL COLOR-BLIND? THE TREATMENT OF RACE, ETHNICITY, INTERSECTIONALITY, AND SEXUALITY IN SOCIOLOGICAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY.

Purpose - The chapter revisits and updates an earlier analysis to assess the extent to which sociological social psychology's treatment of race has changed since 2000, and evaluates the degree to which issues of inter-sectionality and sexuality are engaged in social psychological scholarship. Design/methodology/approach - The chapter provides a content analysis of articles published between 2000 and 2012 in Social Psychology Quarterly, a leading journal in sociological social psychology, and of chapters published in two influential handbooks in social psychology. Findings - It documents a notable increase in the percentage of articles in Social Psychology Quarterly in which race/ethnicity is referred to, inclu-ded in the analysis, or seriously engaged. Patterns vary by methodological approach used in these articles. Social psychological attention to intersectionality and sexuality, as measured by the percentage of articles that broach these topics, is minimal. Research limitations/implications - This chapter restricts its analysis to the leading journal in sociological social psychology, but still demon-strates that there is potential for greater movement toward the incor-poration of race/ethnicity, intersectionality, and sexuality in social psychological scholarship. Originality/value - It calls attention to core topics in sociology that would benefit from greater scholarly engagement by social psychologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]