Back to Search Start Over

The declining uptake rate of atmospheric CO2 by land and ocean sinks.

Authors :
Raupach, M. R.
Gloor, M.
Sarmiento, J. L.
Canadell, J. G.
Frölicher, T. L.
Gasser, T.
Houghton, R. A.
Le Quéré, C.
Trudinger, C. M.
Source :
Biogeosciences Discussions; 2013, Vol. 10 Issue 11, p18407-18454, 48p
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Through 1959-2012, an airborne fraction (AF) of 44% of total anthropogenic CO<subscript>2</subscript> emissions remained in the atmosphere, with the rest being taken up by land and ocean CO<subscript>2</subscript> sinks. Understanding of this uptake is critical because it greatly alleviates the emissions reductions required for climate mitigation. An observable quantity that reflects sink properties more directly than the AF is the CO<subscript>2</subscript> sink rate (k<subscript>S</subscript>), the combined land-ocean CO<subscript>2</subscript> sink flux per unit excess atmospheric CO<subscript>2</subscript> above preindustrial levels. Here we show from observations that k<subscript>S</subscript> declined over 1959-2012 by a factor of about 1/3, implying that CO<subscript>2</subscript> sinks increased more slowly than excess CO<subscript>2</subscript>. We attribute the decline in k<subscript>S</subscript> to four mechanisms: slower-than-exponential CO<subscript>2</subscript> emissions growth (~ 35% of the trend), volcanic eruptions (~ 25 %), sink responses to climate change (~ 20 %), and nonlinear responses to increasing CO<subscript>2</subscript>, mainly oceanic (~ 20 %). The first of these mechanisms is associated purely with extrinsic forcings, and the last two with intrinsic, nonlinear responses of sink processes to changes in climate and atmospheric CO<subscript>2</subscript>. Our results indicate that the effects of these intrinsic, nonlinear responses are already detectable in the global carbon cycle. Although continuing future decreases in k<subscript>S</subscript> will occur under all plausible CO<subscript>2</subscript> emission scenarios, the rate of decline varies between scenarios in non-intuitive ways because extrinsic and intrinsic mechanisms respond in opposite ways to changes in emissions: extrinsic mechanisms cause k<subscript>S</subscript> to decline more strongly with increasing mitigation, while intrinsic mechanisms cause k<subscript>S</subscript> to decline more strongly under high-emission, low-mitigation scenarios as the carbon- climate system is perturbed further from a near-linear regime. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18106277
Volume :
10
Issue :
11
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Biogeosciences Discussions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
93249464
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-10-18407-2013