A prospective study comparing contamination rates between a novel mid-stream urine collection device (Peezy) and a standard method in renal patients.

MLA

Collier, S., et al. “A Prospective Study Comparing Contamination Rates between a Novel Mid-Stream Urine Collection Device (Peezy) and a Standard Method in Renal Patients.” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 67, no. 2, Feb. 2014, pp. 139–42. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201686.

APA

Collier, S., Matjiu, F., Jones, G., Harber, M., & Hopkins, S. (2014). A prospective study comparing contamination rates between a novel mid-stream urine collection device (Peezy) and a standard method in renal patients. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 67(2), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201686

Chicago

Collier, S., F. Matjiu, G. Jones, M. Harber, and S. Hopkins. 2014. “A Prospective Study Comparing Contamination Rates between a Novel Mid-Stream Urine Collection Device (Peezy) and a Standard Method in Renal Patients.” Journal of Clinical Pathology 67 (2): 139–42. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201686.