Back to Search Start Over

A cost-effectiveness analysis of screening strategies for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors :
Straughn JM Jr.
Numnum TM
Rocconi RP
Leath CA III
Partridge EE
Straughn, J Michael Jr
Numnum, T Michael
Rocconi, Rodney P
Leath, Charles A 3rd
Partridge, Edward E
Source :
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease; Oct2004, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p280-284, 5p
Publication Year :
2004

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>To assess the costs and usefulness of colposcopy using three screening strategies for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).<bold>Materials and Methods: </bold>A decision model compared three screening strategies for CIN: (1) patients were screened annually with a conventional Pap smear, (2) patients were screened annually with a liquid-based cytologic method and reflex human papillomavirus testing for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance results, and (3) patients were screened biennially with a liquid-based cytologic method and reflex human papillomavirus testing for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance results.<bold>Results: </bold>Biennial liquid-based screening was the least expensive strategy with a cost of $9.5 million per 100,000 patients. Annual liquid-based screening was the most expensive strategy at $13.7 million. Annual conventional screening had an intermediate cost of $11.6 million. Biennial liquid-based screening referred the fewest patients to colposcopy (11.8%), followed by annual conventional screening and annual liquid-based screening (15.2% and 15.6%, respectively).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Each of these treatment strategies is reasonable; however, biennial liquid-based screening would reduce medical costs significantly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10892591
Volume :
8
Issue :
4
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
106684628
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/00128360-200410000-00004