Back to Search
Start Over
Two pre-treatments for bonding to non-carious cervical root dentin.
- Source :
- American Journal of Dentistry; Dec2015, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p362-366, 5p
- Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Purpose: To investigate the effect of airborne-particle abrasion or diamond bur preparation as pretreatment steps of non-carious cervical root dentin regarding substance loss and bond strength. Methods: 45 dentin specimens produced from crowns of extracted human incisors by grinding the labial surfaces with silicon carbide papers (control) were treated with one of three adhesive systems (Group 1A-C; A: OptiBond FL, B: Clearfil SE Bond, or C: Scotchbond Universal; n= 15/adhesive system). Another 135 dentin specimens (n= 15/group) produced from the labial, non-carious cervical root part of extracted human incisors were treated with one of the adhesive systems after either no pre-treatment (Group 2A-C), pre-treatment with airborne-particle abrasion (CoJet Prep and 50 pm aluminum oxide powder; Group 3A-C), or pre-treatment with diamond bur preparation (40 pm grit size; Group 4A-C). Substance loss caused by the pre-treatment was measured in Groups 3 and 4. After treatment with the adhesive systems, resin composite was applied and all specimens were stored (37°C, 100% humidity, 24 hours) until measurement of microshear bond strength (pSBS). Data were analyzed with a nonparametric ANOVA followed by Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank sum tests (level of significance: α= 0.05). Results: Overall substance loss was significantly lower in Group 3 (median: 19 pm) than in Group 4 (median: 113 pm; P< 0.0001). There were no significant differences in pSBS between the adhesive systems (A-C) in Group 1, Group 3, and Group 4 (P≥ 0.133). In Group 2, OptiBond FL (Group 2A) and Clearfil SE Bond (Group 2B) yielded significantly higher μSBS than Scotchbond Universal (Group 2C; P≤ 0.032). For OptiBond FL and Clearfil SE Bond, there were no significant differences in pSBS between the ground crown dentin and the non-carious cervical root dentin regardless of any pre-treatment of the latter (both P= 0.661). For Scotchbond Universal, the μSBS to non-carious cervical root dentin without pre-treatment was significantly lower than to ground crown dentin and to non-carious cervical root dentin pre-treated with airborne-particle abrasion or diamond bur preparation (P≤ 0.014). (Am J Dent 2015;28:362-366). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- DENTIN
DENTAL bonding
TOOTH abrasion
DENTAL crowns
DENTAL adhesives
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 08948275
- Volume :
- 28
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- Supplemental Index
- Journal :
- American Journal of Dentistry
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 112567265