Back to Search Start Over

An equity first, risk-based framework for managing global climate change.

Authors :
Tonn, Bruce
Source :
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions; Dec2003, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p295, 12p
Publication Year :
2003

Abstract

This paper presents an alternative framework to the approach currently embodied in the Kyoto Protocol for managing global climate change post-2012. The framework has two key provisions. The first is that each person in the world would be ‘allowed’ an equal amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This is labeled the equity-first provision. The second provision focuses on incorporating risk concepts into the setting of GHG emission reductions. It is proposed that the global climate be managed as to avoid three categories of risks: (I) Substantial regional economic, political, and/or biological impacts; (II) Severe global economic, political, and/or biological impacts; and (III) Extinction of humans. Acceptable risk thresholds are suggested to be one-in-a-million, one-in-one-hundred-million, and one-in-ten-billion, respectively. This equity-first, risk-based framework overcomes many criticisms of the current Kyoto Protocol: it explicitly involves all countries on earth; it avoids several administrative issues that are anticipated to plague a global carbon emissions trading market; and it avoids several contentious issues associated with pegging carbon emission reductions to 1990 levels. Because the framework is risk-based and emissions are tied to population and not historic emission levels, the basic framework would not have to be frequently renegotiated, as will be needed for the Kyoto-style approach to take the world past that agreement''s 2012 endpoint. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Subjects

Subjects :
CLIMATE change
RISK assessment

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09593780
Volume :
13
Issue :
4
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
11465651
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(03)00051-7