Back to Search Start Over

Graft inflow modulation in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review.

Authors :
Troisi, Roberto I.
Berardi, Giammauro
Tomassini, Federico
Sainz-Barriga, Mauricio
Source :
Transplantation Reviews (0955470X); Apr2017, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p127-135, 9p
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Introduction Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) has an incidence between 0 and 43% in small-for-size graft (SFSG) adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Portal hypertension following reperfusion and the hyperdynamic splanchnic state are reported as the major triggering factors of SFSS. Intra- and postoperative strategies to prevent or to reduce its onset are still under debate. We analyzed graft inflow modulation (GIM) during adult LDLT considering the indications, efficacy of the available techniques, changes in hemodynamics and outcomes. Materials and methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library Central. Treatment outcomes including in-hospital mortality and morbidity, re-transplantation rate, 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient overall survival and 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates, hepatic artery and portal vein flows and pressures before and after inflow modulation were analyzed. Results From 563 articles, 12 studies dated between 2003 and 2014 fulfilled the selection criteria and were therefore included in the study. These comprised a total of 449 adult patients who underwent inflow modulation during adult-to-adult LDLT. Types of GIM described were splenic artery ligation, splenectomy, meso-caval shunt, spleno-renal shunt, portocaval shunt, and splenic artery embolization. Mortality and morbidity ranged between 0 and 33% and 17% and 70%, respectively. Re-transplantation rates ranged between 0% and 25%. GIM was associated with good survival for both graft and recipients, reaching an 84% actuarial rate at 5 years. Through the use of GIM, irrespective of the technique, a statistically significant reduction of PVF and PVP was obtained. Conclusions GIM is a safe and efficient technique to avoid or limit portal hyperperfusion, especially in cases of SFSG, decreasing overall morbidity and improving outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0955470X
Volume :
31
Issue :
2
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Transplantation Reviews (0955470X)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
123547263
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2016.11.002