Back to Search Start Over

Seismic Vulnerability Mitigation of a Masonry Church by Means of CFRP Retrofitting.

Authors :
Milani, Gabriele
Shehu, Rafael
Valente, Marco
Source :
Procedia Engineering; 2017, Vol. 195, p40-47, 8p
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

The paper presents some numerical results on a Romanesque masonry church located in Emilia-Romagna (Italy), a region recently stricken by a devastating seismic sequence on 20 th - 29 th May 2012. A full investigation of the damages and their comparison with advanced FE analyses, in both linear and nonlinear range are carried out. FE limit analyses are performed through non-commercial software proposed by one of the authors. A remarkable consistency is found among limit analysis results, real performance of the structure under seismic excitation and advanced nonlinear dynamic analyses. In particular, both damage patterns and active failure mechanisms found numerically are consistent with that observed on the church after the seismic event. The results put in evidence the insufficient strength of the apse for combined shear/bending actions, the columns of the central nave for bending, as well as the façade for overturning of the upper part. A seismic upgrading by means of CFRPs composite materials is proposed, designed and analysed quantitatively using FEs, finding an optimal fit between the required performance and the invasivity reduction. The interaction between CFRP strips and masonry substrate is accounted for assuming the behaviour of the reinforcement in agreement with Italian Guidelines for r.c./masonry strengthening with composite materials (CNR DT200). It is found that, with a targeted design, it is possible to prevent premature collapses of the macro-elements, strongly increasing the load carrying capacity of the structure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18777058
Volume :
195
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Procedia Engineering
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
124248907
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.521