Back to Search Start Over

ESGO Survey on Current Practice in the Management of Cervical Cancer.

Authors :
Dostalek, Lukas
Åvall-Lundqvist, Elisabeth
Creutzberg, Carien L.
Kurdiani, Dina
Ponce, Jordi
Dostalkova, Iva
Cibula, David
Source :
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer; Jul2018, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p1226-1231, 6p
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this survey was to acquire an overview of the current management of cervical cancer with an emphasis on the early disease stages. Materials and Methods: A hyperlink to the survey was sent to the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology Office database. The survey contained 6 groups of questions regarding the characteristics of respondents, pretreatment workup, management of the early stages of cervical cancer, adjuvant treatment, fertility-sparing treatment, and surveillance. Results: In total, 566 responses were collected. The most frequent imaging method used in the workup was magnetic resonance imaging (74%), followed by computed tomography (54%) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (25%). Conization or simple hysterectomy was a preferred procedure in stage T1a1 lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI)–positive for 79% of respondents, in stage T1a2 LVSI-negative for 58%, and in stage T1a2 LVSI-positive for 28%. Sentinel lymph node biopsy alone was reported in stage T1a1 by 17% and in stage T1b1 less than 2 cm by 9%, whereas systematic lymphadenectomy by 29% and 90% of respondents. Macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes were considered indications for adjuvant treatment by 96%, 93%, and 68% of respondents, respectively. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was reported by 28% and 19% of respondents in fertility-sparing and nonsparing management in stage T1b1. Over 60% of respondents recommend primary surgery for their patients with T1b2 N0 disease and 81% of them use a combination of adverse prognostic factors as indication for adjuvant radiotherapy in pN0 disease. Conclusions: The results of this survey indicate considerable differences in the workup and treatment of cervical cancer in current clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1048891X
Volume :
28
Issue :
6
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
130502503
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000001314