Back to Search Start Over

Considerations to facilitate a US study that replicates PREDIMED.

Authors :
Jr.jacobs, David R.
Petersen, Kristina S.
Svendsen, Karianne
Ros, Emilio
Sloan, Carol B.
Steffen, Lyn M.
Tapsell, Linda C.
Kris-Etherton, Penny M.
Source :
Metabolism: Clinical & Experimental; Aug2018, Vol. 85, p361-367, 7p
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

The PREDIMED clinical trial provided strong evidence that a Mediterranean dietary pattern (MedDiet) could help prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in high risk middle-aged/older people. This report considers the feasibility of replicating PREDIMED in the U.S., including recommendations for dietary and behavioral principles. A 14-point Mediterranean diet Adherence Score (MEDAS) guided the PREDIMED MedDiet recommendations. At baseline MEDAS points were ~8.5. During intervention this score increased to nearly 11 in MedDiet vs. 9 in control. In the MedDiet groups, only about 0.5 points of the net 2 point MEDAS increase was attributable to the gratis supplements of olive oil or nuts. An issue in a U.S. replication is the large difference in typical U.S. versus Spanish diet and lifestyle. A typical U.S. diet would achieve a MEDAS of 1–2. A replication is scientifically feasible with an assumption such as that the MedDiet reflects a continuum of specific food choices and meal patterns. As such, a 2 point change in MEDAS at any point on the continuum would be hypothesized to reduce incident CVD. A conservative approach would aim for a randomized 4 point MEDAS difference, e.g. 5–6 points vs. an average U.S. diet group that achieved only 1–2 points. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00260495
Volume :
85
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Metabolism: Clinical & Experimental
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
130541601
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2018.05.001