Movement profile influences systemic stress and biomechanical resilience to high training load exposure.

<bold>Objectives: </bold>Determine the influence of movement profile on systemic stress and mechanical loading before and after high training load exposure.<bold>Design: </bold>Cross-sectional cohort study.<bold>Methods: </bold>43 physically active, college-aged field or court sport female athletes participated in this study. Participants were assigned to a "excellent" (n=22; age=20.5±1.9yrs, height=1.67±0.67m, mass=64.5±7.8kg) or "poor" (n=21; age=20.4±1.3yrs, height=1.69±0.67m, mass=60.9±6.1kg) movement group defined by The Landing Error Scoring System. Participants completed five cycles of high training load exercise of 5-min treadmill-running at a speed coincident with 100-120% ventilatory threshold and 10 jump-landings from a 30-cm box. Jump-landing vertical ground reaction force and serum cortisol were evaluated prior to and following exercise. Vertical ground reaction force ensemble averages and 95% confidence interval waveforms were generated for pre-exercise, post-exercise, and pre-post exercise changes. A two-way mixed model ANOVA was used to evaluate the effect of movement profile on systemic stress before and after exercise.<bold>Results: </bold>There was no significant difference in changes in serum cortisol between the poor and excellent groups (p=0.69) in response to exercise. Overall, individuals in the poor group exhibited a higher serum cortisol level (p<0.05, d=0.85 [0.19,1.48]). The poor group exhibited higher magnitude vertical ground reaction force prior to (d=1.02-1.26) and after exercise (d=1.15) during a majority of the stance phase.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Individuals with poor movement profiles experience greater mechanical loads compared to individuals with excellent movement profiles. A poor movement profile is associated with greater overall concentrations of circulating cortisol, representative of greater systemic stress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]