Back to Search Start Over

Survival Outcomes Associated With Clinical and Pathological Response Following Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy in Resected Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors :
Macedo, Francis I.
Ryon, Emily
Maithel, Shishir K.
Lee, Rachel M.
Kooby, David A.
Fields, Ryan C.
Hawkins, William G.
Williams, Greg
Maduekwe, Ugwuji
Kim, Hong J.
Ahmad, Syed A.
Patel, Sameer H.
Abbott, Daniel E.
Schwartz, Patrick
Weber, Sharon M.
Scoggins, Charles R.
Martin, Robert C. G.
Dudeja, Vikas
Franceschi, Dido
Livingstone, Alan S.
Source :
Annals of Surgery; Sep2019, Vol. 270 Issue 3, p400-413, 14p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Objective: To compare the survival outcomes associated with clinical and pathological response in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with FOLFIRINOX (FLX) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GNP) followed by curative-intent pancreatectomy. Background: Newer multiagent NAC regimens have resulted in improved clinical and pathological responses in PDAC; however, the effects of these responses on survival outcomes remain unknown. Methods: Clinicopathological and survival data of PDAC patients treated at 7 academic medical centers were analyzed. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (L-RFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) associated with biochemical (CA 19–9 decrease ≥50% vs <50%) and pathological response (complete, pCR; partial, pPR or limited, pLR) following NAC. Results: Of 274 included patients, 46.4% were borderline resectable, 25.5% locally advanced, and 83.2% had pancreatic head/neck tumors. Vein resection was performed in 34.7% and 30-day mortality was 2.2%. R0 and pCR rates were 82.5% and 6%, respectively. Median, 3-year, and 5-year OS were 32 months, 46.3%, and 30.3%, respectively. OS, L-RFS, and MFS were superior in patients with marked biochemical response (CA 19–9 decrease ≥50% vs <50%; OS: 42.3 vs 24.3 months, P < 0.001; L-RFS-27.3 vs 14.1 months, P = 0.042; MFS-29.3 vs 13 months, P = 0.047) and pathological response [pCR vs pPR vs pLR: OS- not reached (NR) vs 40.3 vs 26.1 months, P < 0.001; L-RFS-NR vs 24.5 vs 21.4 months, P = 0.044; MFS-NR vs 23.7 vs 20.2 months, P = 0.017]. There was no difference in L-RFS, MFS, or OS between patients who received FLX or GNP. Conclusion: This large, multicenter study shows that improved biochemical, pathological, and clinical responses associated with NAC FLX or GNP result in improved OS, L-RFS, and MFS in PDAC. NAC with FLX or GNP has similar survival outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00034932
Volume :
270
Issue :
3
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Annals of Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
138773091
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003468