Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic Performance of Carbon Monoxide Testing by Pulse Oximetry in the Emergency Department.

Authors :
Villalba, Nuria
Osborn, Zachary T.
Derickson, Pamela R.
Manning, Chelsea T.
Herrington, Robert R.
Kaminsky, David A.
Freeman, Kalev
Source :
Respiratory Care; Nov2019, Vol. 64 Issue 11, p1351-1357, 7p, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carbon monoxide (CO) exposure causes roughly 40,000 emergency department (ED) visits annually and is commonly misdiagnosed. Whereas the standard method of carboxyhemoglobin (HbCO) measurement utilizes blood gas analysis, a noninvasive, FDA-cleared alternative exists. We evaluated the performance of pulse oximetry (S<subscript>pCO</subscript>) for identification of CO exposure in ED patients. METHODS: We compared pulse oximetry to blood HbCO levels in a prospective observational study of adult and pediatric subjects recruited from the ED. Nurses screened a convenience sample of patients and referred those with S<subscript>pCO</subscript> ≥ 10% to research staff. Researchers also approached individuals who presented with signs and symptoms of CO toxicity. We determined diagnostic performance with a Bland-Altman analysis and calculated sensitivity and specificity for detection of elevated HbCO at thresholds of ≥ 10% and ≥ 15%. To optimize the potential sensitivity of SpCO for detection of CO toxicity, research technicians performed 3 S<subscript>pCO</subscript> readings within 5 min of the blood draw for laboratory measurement. A positive S<subscript>pCO</subscript> test was defined as any S<subscript>pCO</subscript> ≥ 10%. RESULTS: 42,000 patients were screened, 212 were evaluated, and 126 subjects were enrolled. Median HbCO level was 6% (range 1.6-21.9%). Limits of agreement were -10.3% and 8.1%. Of 23 individuals with elevated HbCO ≥ 10%, 13 were not suspected based on clinical assessment. Critically elevated HbCO was present in 6 individuals. Based on our a priori threshold of 10% for a positive test, pulse oximetry identified 14 of 23 subjects with HbCO ≥ 10%, with a sensitivity of 61% (95% CI 39-80%) and a specificity of 86% (95% CI 78-92%), and 5 of 6 subjects with HbCO ≥ 15%, with a sensitivity of 83% (95% CI 36-100%) and a specificity of 81% (95% CI 73-87%). CONCLUSIONS: Pulse oximetry underestimated HbCO and produced false negative results (ie, S<subscript>pCO</subscript> < 10% for all three measurements) in 17% of ED subjects with elevated HbCO ≥ 15%. Triage screening with pulse oximetry detected cases of elevated HbCO that were not suspected by the clinical provider. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00201324
Volume :
64
Issue :
11
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Respiratory Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
139348306
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.06365