Coalition military personnel with stabilised facial fractures are less likely to require tracheostomy: a comparison of treatment in US and UK Medical Treatment Facilities during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts.

MLA

Pepper, Thomas, et al. “Coalition Military Personnel with Stabilised Facial Fractures Are Less Likely to Require Tracheostomy: A Comparison of Treatment in US and UK Medical Treatment Facilities during the Iraq and Afghanistan Conflicts.” British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 57, no. 10, Dec. 2019, p. e94. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.10.273.

APA

Pepper, T., Breeze, J., Combes, J., & Powers, D. (2019). Coalition military personnel with stabilised facial fractures are less likely to require tracheostomy: a comparison of treatment in US and UK Medical Treatment Facilities during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts. British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 57(10), e94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.10.273

Chicago

Pepper, Thomas, Johno Breeze, James Combes, and David Powers. 2019. “Coalition Military Personnel with Stabilised Facial Fractures Are Less Likely to Require Tracheostomy: A Comparison of Treatment in US and UK Medical Treatment Facilities during the Iraq and Afghanistan Conflicts.” British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 57 (10): e94. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.10.273.