Back to Search Start Over

Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Extracellular Contrast Detects Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Greater Accuracy Than With Gadoxetic Acid or Computed Tomography.

Authors :
Min, Ji Hye
Kim, Jong Man
Kim, Young Kon
Cha, Dong Ik
Kang, Tae Wook
Kim, Honsoul
Choi, Gyu Seong
Choi, Seo-Youn
Ahn, Soohyun
Source :
Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Aug2020, Vol. 18 Issue 9, p2091-2091, 1p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used to detect hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a prospective study to compare the diagnostic performance of CT, MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI), and MRI with hepatobiliary agents (HBA-MRI) in the detection of HCC using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS). We studied 125 participants (102 men; mean age, 55.3 years) with chronic liver disease who underwent CT, ECA-MRI, or HBA-MRI (with gadoxetic acid) before surgery for a nodule initially detected by ultrasound at a tertiary center in Korea, from November 2016 through February 2019. We collected data on major features and assigned LI-RADS categories (v2018) from CT and MRI examinations. We then compared the diagnostic performance for LR-5 for each modality alone, and in combination. In total, 163 observations (124 HCCs, 13 non-HCC malignancies, and 26 benign lesions; mean size, 20.7 mm) were identified. ECA-MRI detected HCC with 83.1% sensitivity and 86.6% accuracy, compared to 64.4% sensitivity and 71.8% accuracy for CT (P <.001) and 71.2% sensitivity (P =.005) and 76.5% accuracy for HBA-MRI (P =.005); all technologies detected HCC with 97.4% specificity. Adding CT to either ECA-MRI (89.2% sensitivity, 91.4% accuracy; both P <.05) or HBA-MRI (82.8% sensitivity, 86.5% accuracy; both P <.05) significantly increased its diagnostic performance in detection of HCC compared with the MRI technologies alone. ECA-MRI identified arterial phase hyperenhancement in a significantly higher proportion of patients (97.6%) than CT (81.5%; P <.001) or HBA-MRI (89.5%; P =.002). ECA-MRI identified non-peripheral washout in 79.8% of patients, vs 74.2% of patients for CT and 73.4% of patients for HBA-MRI (differences not significant). ECA-MRI identified enhancing capsules in 85.5% of patients, vs 33.9% for CT (P <.001) and 41.4% for HBA-MRI (P <.001). In a prospective study of patients with chronic liver disease and a nodule detected by ultrasound, ECA-MRI detected HCC with higher levels of sensitivity and accuracy than CT or HBA-MRI, based on LI-RADS. Diagnostic performance was best when CT was used in combination with MRI compared with MRI alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15423565
Volume :
18
Issue :
9
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
144622396
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.010