Back to Search Start Over

Higher patient assessed quality of chronic care is associated with lower diabetes distress among adults with early-onset type 2 diabetes: Cross-sectional survey results from the Danish DD2-study.

Authors :
Bo, Anne
Jensen, Nanna Husted
Bro, Flemming
Nicolaisen, Sia Kromann
Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
Source :
Primary Care Diabetes; Oct2020, Vol. 14 Issue 5, p522-528, 7p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

<bold>Aim: </bold>Among adults aged 20-45 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus, we examined the perceived quality of chronic care, and its associations with (i) sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and (ii) diabetes distress.<bold>Methods: </bold>In total, 216/460 (47%) completed a self-administered survey assessing sociodemographic characteristics, patient assessed chronic illness care (PACIC-20, scale of 1-5) and diabetes distress (PAID-20, scale of 0-100), and 197 had full quality of care data for assessment. We obtained clinical data from national registers and used linear and logistic regression models to examine associations.<bold>Results: </bold>The mean (SD) PACIC score was 2.6 (0.9) (score range 1-5). Lower PACIC scores were associated with female sex and current unemployment, and with receiving diabetes care in general practice compared with hospital outpatient clinics [mean difference: -0.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) (-0.7 to -0.2)]. People with upper quartile PACIC scores were less likely to report high diabetes distress compared with people with lower quartile PACIC scores [odds Ratio 0.3 95%CI (0.1-0.8)].<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Higher quality of care was associated with lower diabetes distress among adults with early onset type 2 diabetes mellitus, but respondents reported less than optimal quality in several core areas of chronic care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17519918
Volume :
14
Issue :
5
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Primary Care Diabetes
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
145736543
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2020.02.003