Back to Search Start Over

Application of ultrasound for muscle assessment in sarcopenia: 2020 SARCUS update.

Authors :
Perkisas, Stany
Bastijns, Sophie
Baudry, Stéphane
Bauer, Jürgen
Beaudart, Charlotte
Beckwée, David
Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso
Gasowski, Jerzy
Hobbelen, Hans
Jager-Wittenaar, Harriët
Kasiukiewicz, Agnieszka
Landi, Francesco
Małek, Magdalena
Marco, Ester
Martone, Anna Maria
de Miguel, Ana Merello
Piotrowicz, Karolina
Sanchez, Elisabet
Sanchez-Rodriguez, Dolores
Scafoglieri, Aldo
Source :
European Geriatric Medicine; Feb2021, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p45-59, 15p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Key summary points: Aim: Standardizing the use of ultrasound in the assessment of muscle and sarcopenia. Findings: Approach of muscle assessment has been updated according to the most recent literature and anatomical landmarks for 39 different muscles are provided. Message: Using these recommendations, ultrasonographical muscle assessment can be standardized worldwide. Purpose: In 2018, the SARCUS working group published a first article on the standardization of the use of ultrasound to assess muscle. Recommendations were made for patient positioning, system settings and components to be measured. Also, shortcomings in knowledge were mentioned. An important issue that still required standardization was the definition of anatomical landmarks for many muscles. Methods: A systematic search was performed in Medline, SCOPUS and Web of Sciences looking for all articles describing the use of ultrasound in the assessment of muscle not described in the first recommendations, published from 01/01/2018 until 31/01/2020. All relevant terms used for older people, ultrasound and muscles were used. Results: For 39 muscles, different approaches for ultrasound assessment were found that likely impact the values measured. Standardized anatomical landmarks and measuring points were proposed for all muscles/muscle groups. Besides the five already known muscle parameters (muscle thickness, cross-section area, pennation angle, fascicle length and echo-intensity), four new parameters are discussed (muscle volume, stiffness, contraction potential and microcirculation). The former SARCUS article recommendations are updated with this new information that includes new muscle groups. Conclusions: The emerging field of ultrasound assessment of muscle mass only highlights the need for a standardization of measurement technique. In this article, guidelines are updated and broadened to provide standardization instructions for a large number of muscles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18787649
Volume :
12
Issue :
1
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
European Geriatric Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
148889674
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00433-9