Back to Search Start Over

An integrated inter- and intra-row weeding system for row crops.

Authors :
Chandel, Narendra S.
Chandel, Abhilash K.
Roul, Ajay K.
Solanke, Krishna R.
Mehta, C.R.
Source :
Crop Protection (02612194); Jul2021, Vol. 145, pN.PAG-N.PAG, 1p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Weeding is critical to eliminate non-native plants that compete with main crops and adversely affect their production quality and quantity. Numerous prototypes exist for inter-row weeding but very limited for intra-row weed eradication. This study developed a tractor drawn integrated inter- and intra-row weeding (IIIRW) system for field crops. Active rotary tines were used for intra-row weeding and passive tines for inter-row weeding. Optimum operational configurations were obtained with rigorous repeated soil bin experiments, and developed system was evaluated for three growing seasons (2017–19) in field grown maize (Zea mays L.) and pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) crops. Optimum ratios of intra-row tine rotary speed to forward speed (u/v) were in the ranges of 0.8–1.3 that lead to weed mortality of 88.4 % (Buried: 8.5 %, Uprooted: 79.9 %), negligible intact weeds, and plant damage (P d) within 6 %. Sole inter-row weeding operation resulted up to 78.1 % of weed mortality (Buried: 18.1 %, Uprooted: 60.0 %) and negligible P d. Overall weed mortality with the IIIRW system was 92.8 % (Buried: 9.5 %, Uprooted: 83.3 %) in maize and 84.1 % (Buried: 7.6 %, Uprooted: 76.5 %) in pigeon pea crops. Results suggest suitability of the IIIRW system for a range of similar crops for field capacity in ranges of 0.22–0.26 ha/h at recommended operating speeds within 0.50–0.56 m/s. The IIIRW system requires a single prime mover and could be potentially economical and efficient technology for field weeding operations. [Display omitted] • Developed and field evaluated was a hydromechanical inter- and intra-row weeder. • Three-year evaluations in field grown maize and pigeon pea crops. • Mean weeding efficiency up to 88% was attained. • Crop plant damages did not exceed 6%. • High field capacity and low operational costs were evident. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02612194
Volume :
145
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Crop Protection (02612194)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
150020410
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105642