The impact of pharmacist‐led antifungal stewardship interventions in the hospital setting: a systematic review.

Aim: To summarise the evidence on pharmacist‐led antifungal stewardship (AFS) programs in the hospital setting and to evaluate their impact on the quality of antifungal prescribing and infection management, antifungal usage and clinical outcomes. Data sources: A systematic review of English‐language studies identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed on 27 November 2020 and conducted in accordance with PRISMA. Search terms included 'antifungal agent', 'invasive fungal infection', 'antimicrobial stewardship', 'patient care bundles' and 'pharmacist'. Study selection: Eligible studies describing pharmacist‐led quality improvement intervention(s) implemented in the hospital setting targeted at optimising systemic antifungal prescribing. Results: Six hundred and forty‐six studies were identified, and seven met inclusion criteria. Five were dedicated to optimising candidaemia management, one at optimising intensive care unit prescribing of caspofungin and one on antifungal prescribing in haematology and oncology units. All studies measured varied metrics relating to quality of prescribing and infection management, reporting improvement in proportion of effective antifungal therapy (n = 1/1), appropriate antifungal selection (n = 1/1), dosing (n = 2/3), management of drug–drug interactions (n = 1/1) and reduced time to antifungal initiation (n = 4/4). Studies that implemented a candidaemia bundle of care reported improvements in composite bundle adherence (n = 2/2), with greatest improvement in ophthalmological consultation (n = 4/4), echocardiography (n = 2/2) and infectious diseases consultation (n = 3/3). There was reduction in antifungal expenditure (n = 4/4) and consumption (n = 2/4). Pharmacist‐led AFS programs did not influence clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Available evidence suggests that pharmacist‐led AFS interventions can improve the quality and timeliness of antifungal prescribing and reduce antifungal usage. Further research is required to assess the impact on clinical and microbiological outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]