Back to Search Start Over

Diaphragmatic Kinetics Assessment by Tissue Doppler Imaging and Extubation Outcome.

Authors :
Cammarota, Gianmaria
Boniolo, Ester
Santangelo, Erminio
De Vita, Nello
Verdina, Federico
Crudo, Samuele
Sguazzotti, Ilaria
Perucca, Raffaella
Messina, Antonio
Zanoni, Marta
Azzolina, Danila
Navalesi, Paolo
Longhini, Federico
Vetrugno, Luigi
Bignami, Elena
Corte, Francesco della
Tarquini, Riccardo
De Robertis, Edoardo
Vaschetto, Rosanna
Source :
Respiratory Care; Jun2021, Vol. 66 Issue 6, p983-993, 11p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The assessment of diaphragmatic kinetics through tissue Doppler imaging (dTDI) was recently proposed as a means to describe diaphragmatic activity in both healthy individuals and intubated patients undergoing weaning from mechanical ventilation. Our primary aim was to investigate whether the diaphragmatic excursion velocity measured with dTDI at the end of a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) was different in subjects successfully extubated versus those who passed the trial but exhibited extubation failure within 48 h after extubation. METHODS: We enrolled 100 adult subjects, all of whom had successfully passed a 30-min SBT conducted in CPAP of = cm H<subscript>2</subscript>O. In cases of extubation failure within 48 h after liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation, subjects were re-intubated or supported through noninvasive ventilation. dTDI was performed at the end of the SBT to assess excursion, velocity, and acceleration. RESULTS: Extubation was successful in 79 subjects, whereas it failed in 21 subjects. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) inspiratory peak excursion velocity (3.1 [IQR 2.0-4.3] vs 1.8 [1.3-2.6] cm/s, P < .001), mean velocity (1.6 [IQR 1.2-2.4] vs 1.1 [IQR 0.8-1.4] cm/s, P < .001), and acceleration (8.8 [IQR 5.0-17.8] vs 4.2 [IQR 2.4-8.0] cm/s², P = .002) were all significantly higher in subjects who failed extubation compared with those who were successfully extubated. Similarly, the median expiratory peak relaxation velocity (2.6 [IQR 1.9-4.5] vs 1.8 [IQR 1.2-2.5] cm/s, P < .001), mean velocity (1.1 [IQR 0.7-1.7] vs 0.9 [IQR 0.6-1.0] cm/s, P = .002), and acceleration (11.2 [IQR 9.1-19.0] vs 7.1 [IQR 4.6-12.0] cm/s², P = .004) were also higher in the subjects who failed extubation. CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, at the end of SBT, subjects who developed extubation failure within 48 h after extubation experienced a greater diaphragmatic activation compared with subjects who were successfully extubated. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT03962322.) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00201324
Volume :
66
Issue :
6
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Respiratory Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
150953542
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.08702