Back to Search Start Over

New Nodal Staging for Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors A Multi-institutional and National Data Analysis.

Authors :
Xu-Feng Zhang
Feng Xue
Ding-Hui Dong
Lopez-Aguiar, Alexandra G.
Poultsides, George
Makris, Eleftherios
Rocha, Flavio
Kanji, Zaheer
Weber, Sharon
Fisher, Alexander
Fields, Ryan
Krasnick, Bradley A.
Idrees, Kamran
Smith, Paula M.
Cho, Cliff
Beems, Megan
Yi Lv
Maithel, Shishir K.
Pawlik, Timothy M.
Source :
Annals of Surgery; Jul2021, Vol. 274 Issue 1, p28-35, 8p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prognostic role of metastatic lymph node (LN) number and the minimal number of LNs for optimal staging of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). Background: Prognosis relative to number of LN metastasis (LNM), and minimal number of LNs needed to evaluate for accurate staging, have been poorly defined for pNETs. Methods: Number of LNM and total number of LN evaluated (TNLE) were assessed relative to recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in a multi-institutional database. External validation was performed using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry. Results: Among 854 patients who underwent resection, 233 (27.3%) had at least 1 LNM. Patients with 1, 2, or 3 LNM had a comparable worse RFS versus patients with no nodal metastasis (5-year RFS, 1 LNM 65.6%, 2 LNM 68.2%, 3 LNM 63.2% vs 0 LNM 82.6%; all P < 0.001). In contrast, patients with 4 LNM (proposed N2) had a worse RFS versus patients who either had 1 to 3 LNM (proposed N1) or node-negative disease (5-year RFS, 4 LNM 43.5% vs 1–3 LNM 66.3%, 0 LNM 82.6%; all P < 0.05) [C-statistics area under the curve (AUC) 0.650]. TNLE 8 had the highest discriminatory power relative to RFS (AUC 0.713) and OS (AUC 0.726) among patients who had 1 to 3 LNM, and patients who had 4 LNM in the multi-institutional and SEER database (n ¼ 2764). Conclusions: Regional lymphadenectomy of at least 8 lymph nodes was necessary to stage patients accurately. The proposed nodal staging of N0, N1, and N2 optimally staged patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00034932
Volume :
274
Issue :
1
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Annals of Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
151409296
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003478