Three Automated Quantitative Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Analyses Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve in Swine.

MLA

Bradley, Andrew J., et al. “Three Automated Quantitative Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Analyses Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve in Swine.” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 14, no. 9, Sept. 2021, pp. 1871–73. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.03.013.

APA

Bradley, A. J., Groves, D. W., Benovoy, M., Yang, S. K., Kozlov, S., Taylor, J. L., Sirajuddin, A., Hsu, L.-Y., & Arai, A. E. (2021). Three Automated Quantitative Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Analyses Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve in Swine. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 14(9), 1871–1873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.03.013

Chicago

Bradley, Andrew J., Daniel W. Groves, Mitchel Benovoy, Sarah K. Yang, Shawn Kozlov, Joni L. Taylor, Arlene Sirajuddin, Li-Yueh Hsu, and Andrew E. Arai. 2021. “Three Automated Quantitative Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Analyses Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve in Swine.” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 14 (9): 1871–73. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.03.013.