Back to Search Start Over

Patient and Provider Feedback for Radiology Reports: Implementation of a Quality Improvement Project in a Multi-Institutional Setting.

Authors :
Bavadian, Niusha
Tan, Nelly
Pesch, Arthur J.
McMullen, Kaley
Haman, Mike
Chan, Francis
Volk, Michael L.
Jacobson, J. Paul
Krishnaraj, Arun
Pesch, A J
Volk, Michael
Jacobson, Paul
Source :
Journal of the American College of Radiology; Oct2021, Vol. 18 Issue 10, p1430-1438, 9p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Radiology does not routinely solicit feedback on radiology reports. The aim of the study is to report the feasibility and initial results of a multi-institutional quality improvement project implementing patient and provider feedback for radiology reports.<bold>Methods: </bold>A HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-waived quality improvement effort at two institutions obtaining patient and provider feedback for radiology reports was implemented from January 2018 to May 2020.<bold>Intervention: </bold>A two-question survey (quantitative review and open text box feedback) was embedded into the electronic health records for patients and providers. Text-based feedback was evaluated, and patterns of feedback were categorized: thoroughness of reports, error in reports, timeliness of reports, access to reports, desire for patient summary, and desire for key images. We performed the χ2 test for categorical variables. P < .05 was considered significant.<bold>Results: </bold>Of 367 responses, patients provided 219 of 367 (60%), and providers provided 148 of 367 (40%) of the feedback. A higher proportion of patients reported satisfaction with reports (76% versus 65%, P = .023) and provided more feedback compared with providers (71% versus 50%, P < .0001). Both patients and providers commented on the thoroughness of reports (12% of patients versus 9% of providers) and errors in reports (8% of patients and 9% of providers). Patients disproportionately commented on timeliness of reports (11%) and access to the reports (6%) compared with providers (3% each). In addition, 7% of patients expressed a desire for patient summaries.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Report-specific patient and provider feedback demonstrate the feasibility of embedding surveys into electronic medical records. Up to 9% of the feedback addressed an error in reports. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15461440
Volume :
18
Issue :
10
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152577211
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.06.006