Back to Search Start Over

The impact of PRODIGE 7 on the current worldwide practice of CRS-HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A web-based survey and 2021 statement by Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI).

Authors :
van de Vlasakker, Vincent C.J.
Lurvink, Robin J.
Cashin, Peter H.
Ceelen, Wim
Deraco, Marcello
Goéré, Diane
González-Moreno, Santiago
Lehmann, Kuno
Li, Yan
Moran, Brendan
Morris, David L.
Piso, Pompiliu
Quadros, Claudio A.
Rau, Beate
Somashekhar, S.P.
Sommariva, Antonio
van der Speeten, Kurt
Spiliotis, John
Sugarbaker, Paul H.
Teo, Melissa C.C.
Source :
European Journal of Surgical Oncology; Nov2021, Vol. 47 Issue 11, p2888-2892, 5p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

The PRODIGE 7-trial investigated the additional value of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). The results of PRODIGE 7 were presented at the 2018 ASCO meeting showing that 30 min oxaliplatin-based HIPEC did not improve overall survival. The current study investigated the impact of PRODIGE 7 on the worldwide practice of CRS and HIPEC. CRS-HIPEC experts from 19 countries were invited through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) to complete an online survey concerning the current CRS-HIPEC practice in their hospital and country, and were asked to appraise the effect of PRODIGE 7. The survey was completed by 18/19 experts. Although their personal opinions of CRS-HIPEC were barely influenced by PRODIGE 7, they reported a substantial impact on daily practice. This included a switch towards Mitomycin-C based HIPEC-regimens and prolongation of HIPEC perfusion time, a reduction in the number of referrals from non-HIPEC centers, a reduction in national consensus, the removal of HIPEC from national guidelines, and a reduced reimbursement rate. The PRODIGE 7 has had a major impact on the practice of CRS-HIPEC for CPM worldwide. HIPEC remains an attractive option with potential for control and eradication of disease and further studies into the optimal HIPEC-regimen are urgently needed. Meanwhile, given the complexity of the treatment of patients with CPM, and the proven benefits of optimal CRS, referral of patients with potentially resectable CPM to expert centers is recommended whilst the precise role of HIPEC is further evaluated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07487983
Volume :
47
Issue :
11
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
153825931
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.023