Evaluating Care in Safety Net Hospitals: Clinical Outcomes and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Quality of Care in California.

<bold>Objectives: </bold>To examine the characteristics of safety net (sn) and non-sn neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in California and evaluate whether the site of care is associated with clinical outcomes.<bold>Study Design: </bold>This population-based retrospective cohort study of 34 snNICUs and 104 non-snNICUs included 22 081 infants born between 2014 and 2018 with a birth weight of 401-1500 g or gestational age of 22-29 weeks. Quality of care as measured by the Baby-MONITOR score and rates of survival without major morbidity were compared between snNICUs and non-snNICUs.<bold>Results: </bold>Black and Hispanic infants were cared for disproportionately in snNICUs, where care and outcomes varied widely. We found no significant differences in Baby-Measure Of Neonatal InTensive care Outcomes Research (MONITOR) scores (z-score [SD]: snNICUs, -0.31 [1.3]; non-snNICUs, 0.03 [1.1]; P = .1). Among individual components, infants in snNICUs exhibited lower rates of human milk nutrition at discharge (-0.64 [1.0] vs 0.27 [0.9]), lower rates of no health care-associated infection (-0.27 [1.1] vs 0.14 [0.9]), and higher rates of no hypothermia on admission (0.39 [0.7] vs -0.25 [1.1]). We found small but significant differences in survival without major morbidity (adjusted rate, 65.9% [95% CI, 63.9%-67.9%] for snNICUs vs 68.3% [95% CI, 67.0%-69.6%] for non-snNICUs; P = .02) and in some of its components; snNICUs had higher rates of necrotizing enterocolitis (3.8% [3.4%-4.3%] vs 3.1% [95% CI, 2.8%-3.4%]) and mortality (95% CI, 7.1% [6.5%-7.7%] vs 6.6% [6.2%-7.0%]).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>snNICUs achieved similar performance as non-snNICUs in quality of care except for small but significant differences in any human milk at discharge, infection, hypothermia, necrotizing enterocolitis, and mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]