Back to Search Start Over

Positive Cultures Can Be Safely Ignored in Revision Arthroplasty Patients That Do Not Meet the 2018 International Consensus Meeting Criteria.

Authors :
Goh, Graham S.
Tarabichi, Saad
Clarkson, Samuel J.
Zanna, Luigi
Citak, Mustafa
Parvizi, Javad
Source :
Journal of Arthroplasty; Nov2022, Vol. 37 Issue 11, p2257-2261, 5p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>During aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA), one or more cultures may occasionally isolate an organism. The hypothesis of this study was that in a portion of patients undergoing revision arthroplasty for aseptic failure, culture may isolate an organism(s) that can be left untreated.<bold>Methods: </bold>All patients undergoing revision TJA from 2000 to 2017 at two institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized as aseptic if they were appropriately investigated preoperatively and did not meet the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria. In the aseptic revision cohort, patients with a single positive culture or multiple cultures positive for different organisms ("organism-positive") and patients who had negative intraoperative cultures ("organism-negative") were compared based on demographics, comorbidities, operative details, subsequent reoperations, and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).<bold>Results: </bold>In total, 3,234 International Consensus Meeting-negative aseptic revision TJAs were included, of which 215 patients (6.6%) were organism-positive, 196 (91.2%) had a single positive culture, and 19 (8.8%) were positive for 2 or more distinct organisms (ie, polymicrobial). The most prevalent organisms were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (37.5%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (9.6%), and Cutibacterium acnes (8.0%). Demographics and operative details were comparable between the groups. Using multiple regressions there was no association between culture positivity and the rate of reoperation or PJI.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Isolation of organisms by culture in patients undergoing revision for aseptic failure was not uncommon. As long as these patients were appropriately investigated preoperatively and PJI was excluded, these findings suggest that culture results may be ignored without subjecting patients to additional antimicrobial treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08835403
Volume :
37
Issue :
11
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of Arthroplasty
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
159563841
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.015